The decision to add the voice over in the film not only
changed the flow of the film but it also changed the way the audience watches
the film. The decision to take the voice over out of the film helps the flow of
the film a lot more than I thought it was going to. While Deckard (Harrison
Ford) is narrating the voice over I found myself not paying attention as much
to what I was seeing. I was missing out on a lot of the visual aspects of the
film. I felt as though the voice-overs also slowed the film down. It kept
giving me narrative for things that I felt I could found out for myself. The
decision to add the voice-over has dumbed the film down and taken credit away
from the audience.
“’I was
desperately unhappy with it (the first cut). . .The final version (the first
cut) was something that I was completely unhappy with” (Pfeiffer 119). It
seems it was obvious to everyone, audience, director and leading actor that the
voice-over is an unnecessary addition to the film. The films meaning changes
the way we view the characters. Instead of being able to make out the
characters thoughts/feelings by watching the images and actors reactions, we
are force fed what the narrative tells us. The voice-overs in the 1982 version
force a lack of thought from the audience. In the revised version of the film
we are left to ponder more about the Deckard’s thoughts and we are forced to
make our own unique opinion about the character. It also makes us pay more
attention to the actors and to the images that the director has carefully
chosen to show us at certain times. Ford was upset with the decision to add the
voice-overs and I feel as though he was upset because he probably feels that
his acting was enough to tell the story.
I like the version
without the voice-over much more because the voice-over gives the film a very
corny feel. I found myself laughing at the film at serious parts just because I
felt that Ford’s added narrative was half-assed and also corny. You never want
to add things to a finished piece. If I didn't know that there was a version
without the voice-over I wouldn't really have thought about the voice-over
nearly as much but I would have left the film think that Blade Runner was an old corny movie. I’m glad they decided to do
the right thing and go back and take out the voice-over. I’m actually surprised
it ever was released with the voice-overs. In most cases its better to allow
your audience to think about the film’s deeper meaning themselves and form
their own opinions.
I think that you are right, the voice-over's are a very cheesy and unnecessary part of the film. Although it was part of the production company's plan to do this, there should have been a better way to reflect a clearer plot line than to just mash voice-over all on top of the scenes. However, I do see why voice-overs were an appealing option for parts of the film. The film noir style and setting are usually aided by a well thought out voice-over narrative. The problem that arises in this film though, is that the extra narrative and exposition is not needed, there are some parts of the film that might confuse some people, but for the most part, there is a pretty basic theme, Harrison Ford is on a mission to kill some people. If the audience can't follow that I wouldn't expect a voice-over to keep them on track either.
ReplyDeleteI think that you are right, the voice-over's are a very cheesy and unnecessary part of the film. Although it was part of the production company's plan to do this, there should have been a better way to reflect a clearer plot line than to just mash voice-over all on top of the scenes. However, I do see why voice-overs were an appealing option for parts of the film. The film noir style and setting are usually aided by a well thought out voice-over narrative. The problem that arises in this film though, is that the extra narrative and exposition is not needed, there are some parts of the film that might confuse some people, but for the most part, there is a pretty basic theme, Harrison Ford is on a mission to kill some people. If the audience can't follow that I wouldn't expect a voice-over to keep them on track either.
ReplyDelete