No Sheep.
The movie Blade
Runner, 1982, portrayed Richard Deckard as a distant cousin of the Richard
Deckard character in Phillip K. Dick’s novel. For starters, the Richard Deckard
in the movie had already developed some sort of empathy towards the droid
before the audience had even been introduced to him. The comparison point in
the book, when Richard is informed of what happened to Dave and how he is being
sent to test out the scale, Richard has just been introduced to this thought
provoking idea. This first difference between both Deckard’s also ends up being
one of the few similarities that both Deckard’s have.
Another
prominent difference is the absence of the electric sheep. His obsession for acquiring
a real animal in the book, which is the driving force behind the retirements,
is nonexistent. Deckard in the movie does not have an electric sheep. The
electric sheep in the book made it clear that society had a fixed idea of what
was and what wasn’t. Everything else, the Sidney catalog, the specials and the
nexus 6 were the little details that made the idea of there being a distinction
between droids and human seem plausible. Instead, the movie relies on visuals
to explain the book’s clear distinction between droid and human.
Following
this time line, Richard in the movie is forced to entertain the request of his
old boss while the Richard in the book embarks on the journey for the monetary
value. As stated above, the ownership of live animals was a sign of power.
Deckard in the book felt compelled to live up to the society’s standards which
is why he was happy to have so many droids to retire because he could finally replace
the electric sheep with a real animal.
The last
eye sore difference between the two Deckard’s was the absence of Iran, Deckard’s
wife. In the book, Deckard lives with his wife who is in a way, another role in
Deckard’s ability to continue being a Blade Runner. He has to provide for his
wife both financially and socially. With the bounty money he can buy her things
(such as the real animal) and raise her from the miserable experience of being
on earth. In the movie, Deckard does not have that reason to work hard which is
where Rachel comes in and is completely transformed from the emotionless seducer
to a soul mate. Someone had to take Iran’s spot to motivate Deckard and at the
same time serve as the final say in Richard’s capability of sympathizing with
droids.
Overall,
there were a couple of main “beings” that were not in the movies that slightly
altered the meaning of the movie to the book, but through the shifting of
elements, the lack of beings were accounted for.
No comments:
Post a Comment