Try as I might, I cannot help but see Luke as the traditional hero as per Campbell’s archetype. Han, while certainly heroic, doesn’t follow the format closely enough to be interpreted the same way, instead fulfilling a more modern concept of the hero, complete with flaws and some less-than-heroic traits. Though I’m sure a convincing argument could be made for his fulfillment of the role, I personally don’t believe Han has enough backstory or motivation to make a complete claim to the position as a Campbell Hero. Han is much too earthly in his journey to consider it akin to Luke’s spiritual journey. Han is instead a realist, the civic hero to contrast with Luke’s otherworldly priorities of the struggle between good and evil, more concerned with the here and now, the lives of the common people, and his own human concerns.
However, Luke’s claim to the role as Campbell’s hero is glaringly obvious, as the format of the trilogy so directly utilizes the format of The Hero With a Thousand Faces. He fills all four characteristics of the hero, in that he is male, of lowly birth, orphaned, and bears a nobility of purpose. As we’ve already looked at in the past, Luke’s Departure for his journey has a distinct Call to Adventure in A New Hope as Obi-Wan informs him of his potential, and begins the journey after Luke’s refusal, and subsequent resolve to defeat the Empire. His Initiation also takes place in A New Hope, as he progresses on the Road of Trials in his first encounters with the Empire on the Death Star, and discovers his true powers of the Force as his Supernatural Aid and succeeds in destroying the Death Star. From a narrative perspective of the entire trilogy, the climax of The Empire Strikes Back acts as The Belly of the Whale. Luke is almost defeated, and things are looking their darkest as he loses to Vader, but it is also the point of rebirth as Luke finally learns the truth about his father, and is physically altered with his new robotic hand.
Return of the Jedi finally gives us a true conclusion, wherein many of the loose ends the previous films have left us with are resolved. Most importantly is the Atonement of the Father, as good triumphs over evil in Vader’s final hours, redeeming both he himself, and by extension Luke as his son, struggling to come to terms with the dark inside his heart, granting both Skywalkers clarity they were previously missing. As the reading states in startlingly appropriate terms, “[The Hero] beholds the face of the father, understands -- and the two are atoned” (Campbell 147). Finally, Luke has his Return, perhaps slightly morose, but spiritually fulfilled and gratified by the end of his journey, finally awarded the enlightenment and self actualization pursued by the contemplative hero.
Jonathan Lam
ReplyDeleteWhile I do agree with you that Luke Skywalker fits the definition of a hero, as set out by Campbell, more closely than Han Solo does, I would argue that Han also can be defined as a hero but not with Campbell's definition. If one looks at Campbell's definition of a hero, he basically incorporates that a hero must have a strong spiritual side and attachment to the definition. However, Campbell seems to portray his hero as the only type of hero in existence. Yes, Han Solo is not your typical spiritual hero, but I believe that the films needed his civic hero archetype to play in parallel to Luke's spiritual hero. Both eventually do fight for a cause that is greater than their own, but the they go about doing this in different ways. I believe that as long as we incorporate several definitions of a hero, then we can place Luke and Han on equal footing. However, if we are strictly only using Campbell's definition of the hero, then obviously, Luke will have higher footing than Han because it seems that Luke's character was almost developed solely using Campbell's definition of a hero. Luke definitely plays as the hero on the forefront, and I agree with your assessment, but Han can also be viewed as a hero through a different scope as well.
First off I would like to say that it was a pleasure to read your review on the characters of Han and Luke, and which was Campbell's definition of a Hero. I personally believe that Luke fits Campbell's definition better than Han for a number of reasons. First off while both Han and Luke are loners, Luke's situation is through no fault of his own. Han way of life is a result of the life choices and decisions. Whether for good or bad it can be said that he is a result of his actions. Luke had no choice in his mother dying or his father becoming Darth Vader. Secondly Han does not have the mystical mentor presented in Yoda or Obi-Wan. Han, in fact, scoffs at these mentors, referring to Obi-Wan as a crazy old man. Sure it can be said that Han may have father issue but we know for a fact Luke had father issuers which were brought up in Empire and resolved in Jedi.
ReplyDelete