Friday, January 10, 2014

Gaspari: Hanover Street

Hanover Street presents a conflict between the primary male figures in the film. Halloran and Sellinger portray two different styles of strong masculine role models, but at the same time, one is portrayed as more heroic than the other in the film. Sellinger postulates Halloran is like a man skating on a lake who saves a boy who has fallen into the ice, and that he is like the man who wraps the child in his jacket. Halloran is praised and all Sellinger gets is a wet jacket. This description of these figure is somewhat accurate, as Halloran does seem to have a way with being in the right place at the right time. He saves his entire crew's life when he decides he hears something is wrong with the engine and decides not to take the bomber out on a run. Also, when Halloran's crew is killed by flak across in to German occupied France, he manages to survive and parachute out alongside the aid of someone who speaks French and German fluently.
        Sellinger is much different in most ways from Halloran and he is much more reserved and mature. However, Sellinger decides to fly into enemy territory for heroic reasons as well. Sellinger does not want any more untrained spies to be killed, but more importantly he does not want to live the life of a man who is only "pleasant". The issue does not lie in why the characters are heroic though, because both of these men are clearly good people in how we see them represented in the story. The comparison of how these characters both make heroic actions is fairly one sided though, as Harrison Ford's charm makes Halloran seem like a hyper-masculine war hero. Halloran is the American wildcard in this film, while Sellinger is the settled down, domesticated man, "the archetypal upper-crust British gentleman who discovers he would rather die than remain dull." (Pfeiffer) While Halloran and Sellinger are opposites, in the end Sellinger gets the girl, but only because Halloran in the end is truly heroic in that he loves Margaret so much that he feels he has to let her go.

     
  I think that the film does a good job of showing war and heroism but at the same time highlighting the romantic relations in the first half of the film. Peter Hyams creates an interesting piece here by making the audience think about how we see heroism and romance together in this film, and while there are some cheesy parts, I think that overall there is success in evoking emotional response from the characters romantic entanglement. I do think there are parts of this film that are very cheesy, but I think that many of the action scenes were exaggerated and unrealistic in a way that made the film more entertaining.



2 comments:

  1. I agree with you that Halloran does seem to be in the right place at the right time. He always seems to make the right decisions and do what the people around him aren’t capable of doing. Halloran and Sellinger’s strengths compliment each other very well. Without each other they could not have achieved their mission. Like you said, Sellinger can speak French and German fluently which becomes absolutely vital to getting those documents and obviously Halloran was the muscle that kept them alive.
    While Sellinger is portrayed to be the weaker of the two, I think that he really acts very brave in the end of the film. Not only is he composed while surrounded by Nazis he also tells Halloran to go on without him when he is about to fall to his death. He character is “pleasant” but I think he achieves his goal of breaking out of his norm and doing something that he has never done before, heroic.
    I agree with you that some of the action parts were really cheesy, like at the end when the Nazi’s are chasing them and wreck their car and it just explodes out of no where for no reason. I laughed when those things would happen but I think it added to the entertainment. I also agree that a lot of parts were exaggerated but in the end I enjoyed the movie.

    Patrick Sanderson

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I support your idea that Halloran's man-of-action bravery is definitely more idealized in the movie, your evidence to support the idea that Halloran is "in the right place at the right time" is a little inaccurate. Halloran does not save his crew because he hears something wrong with the engine. This is a part of the movie where Halloran's reckless bravado falters. He thinks that he hears an unsettling noise in the engine, but the mechanic determines that nothing was actually wrong with it. For the first time in the movie, Halloran is afraid to act. The guilt he feels when the substituted crew ends up dying on the mission he should have been on show and the initial trepidation he feels show a different more vulnerable side of his culture. Margaret has made him vulnerable. Plus, it is this scene which allows his commanding officer to force him to take the dangerous mission of dropping Sellinger into enemy territory (I think his guilt was also involved in his acceptance of the operation).
    Other then that, I agree with all of your other opinions within this blog. Especially you asserting that Halloran's truly heroic action is when he lets Margaret go. Although his rescue of Sallinger is definitely a pinnacle point in the movie, this active response to danger is a typical aspect of Halloran's bravery. His decision to break up with Margaret, shows that he is a round character whose courage has matured.

    ReplyDelete