Presumed Innocent is an interesting movie. It is full of action, anticipation, and keeps
the audience constantly thinking at every turn.
From the start of the movie, it was thought that Rusty was innocent but
several events and assumptions in the film made the audience and other
characters question whether or not he was truly innocent.
One scene in the movie that questions his innocence was the
scene where Rusty walks into the office of Horgan. All the people in the office points fingers
to him that he might not be innocent.
This was the first scene where the audience questioned his innocence
because we started to see previous small details that might just add to
evidence of him being guilty. The fact
that we already knew that he had a sexual encounter or relationship with Carolyn
kind of made them accusing him look true.
When the flashback was shown, it also made it seem as though he might be
capable of doing something like killing her.
Another scene was when in court when the jury found out
Rusty requested that the phone logs between him and Carolyn be basically
ignored. This allowed the audience to
reflect back to when he was telling his partner about the phone calls from her
apartment to his house. This made him
look even more suspisious because they were actually on the night she was
murdered. The fact that he wanted those
ignored made it seem as though he was trying to cover up for something. He just looked even more guilty.
Another incident was when Rusty’s friend pulled out the cup
that had been used to get his finger prints in the case. His friend said he took the glass. This made the audience believe that even his
own partner did not trust him, so why should we. At this point, all the evidence actually did
point to him.
The mise-en-scene for the scene for the scene where Rusty
was in Horgan’s office is good to analyze to see the slant of the scene. Lighting key played a key role in this
scene. The scene is very dim compared to
the rest of the movie. Rusty walks into
the office that is dim. This gives the
audience the feel that maybe something “shady” is about to happen. When something is dim or rooms are dim, we
tend to think about something is being discussed privately. This is the feel that Rusty probably got as
well as soon as he walked into the room.
Another element that is important is density. The density in this scene is
interesting. We see that it seems
congested or tight, almost like there is no escape. Rusty walks into a scene that almost appears
to hit a dead-end because of the spacing behind the officers that are accusing
him.
Another element would be character proxemics. When Rusty walks into the office, we see a
tremendous amount of space between the accusing officials and Rusty. This gives the audience a sense of separation
and gives light to a new suspicion.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Each each of the scenes you mentioned definitely make the audience question Rusty's innocence. However we must presume his innocence because as the law goes he is innocent until proven guilty. By the end of the film we realize Rusty may not particularly be guilty of murder but he is in no way an innocent person. Even the victim is not an innocent person. As the film progresses we discover Carolyn was very scheming and manipulates everyone around her. This film identifies that no one is innocent and that everyone has darker guilty sides to them. I especially like your analysis of the mise-en-scene in Horgan’s office because it captures this idea. The low key lighting and high density definitely made the scene tight and claustrophobic. Watching it I felt uneasy and definitely got the feeling something “shady” was happening. An earlier scene was well lit as Rusty and Horgan talked about more “innocent” or clean matters. However later when their discussion could be considered corrupt or even incriminating the mise-en-scene reflects it showing us Rusty’s and Horgan’s darker sides.
ReplyDelete