Early on in the making of Presumed Innocent, there was conflict between producer Sidney
Pollack and director Alan J. Pakula about whether the focus of the film should
be on lead character Rusty Sabich’s sexual attraction to murder victim, Carolyn
Polhemus, or something deeper. “Pakula wanted to make the passion angle
secondary to a story about the justice system and the irony of a man of
presumably high morality being victimized by the very system he has served so
diligently for so many years. Ultimately, Pakula’s vision won out” (Pfeiffer
184). This could not be made more evident in the intense court room scenes and
is established with the opening and closing monologues of the movie.
It is well known that in any case brought to court, the
convicted is “innocent until proven guilty.” The tides are clearly turned
against Rusty the instant he is accused of the murder. None of Rusty’s long-time
colleagues jumps to his defense, but rather give way immediately to the belief
that Rusty committed this heinous crime for various reasons. The first is that
it is the most convenient explanation, providing people with a sense of
security to know that the crime was solved swiftly and efficiently and no
murderer is on the loose. The second is that it supports their own selfish
purposes to blame Rusty for the crime, making themselves feel better in the
morally shaky decisions they have made in their life because it has not been as
bad as Rusty’s wrongdoing. This idea is embodied in Raymond Horgan, Rusty’s
boss and mentor. After discovering that Rusty has also had an affair with
Carolyn, he jumps to the conclusion that Rusty murdered her out of jealousy and
to sabotage Raymond’s political career. In fact, his belief that Rusty has
betrayed him reveals his own insecurities. If Rusty did not commit the murder,
it would mean that Carolyn was only sleeping with Raymond to advance her own
career, rather than out of genuine interest, and that Raymond had placed his
trust in the wrong person.
Finally, Rusty’s presumed innocence is undermined by Rusty’s
colleagues’ ultimate willingness to send him to jail for a crime he did not
commit. Being framed in order to cover up the bribery scandal that Carolyn was
involved in shows not only the characters’ disregard for Rusty’s well-being,
but also for the sworn purpose of their jobs: to bring real criminals to justice.
This is especially seen when the coroner, Dr. Kumagai, attempts to deny notes
that he wrote down while examining Carolyn’s body while on the witness stand
and tries to change his original theory of how Carolyn was murdered. He even
goes so far as to refuse to explain what a tubal ligation is. The blatant
denials of various sketchy pieces of evidence in the case truly frame Rusty’s
predicament as the blame is placed squarely upon his shoulders with little room
for help.
No comments:
Post a Comment