Presumed Innocent is a 1990 crime drama
film that tells the story of Rusty Sabich (Harrison Ford), a prosecutor who is
suspected of murdering his colleague and former lover, Carolyn Polhemus (Greta
Scacchi). Presumed Innocent was critically acclaimed upon its release and
Harrison Ford’s role was praised, as he took a step away from his regular
action roles (Pfeiffer 187). The title of the movie means that the defendant is
considered innocent until the prosecution can prove its case beyond a
reasonable doubt. Throughout the film, there are several instances in which
Rusty Sabich’s innocence is undermined.
Rusty,
who is a married man, committed infidelity by having a romantic relationship
with his colleague, Carolyn Polhemus. When Rusty is assigned to investigate
Polhemus’ murder, his romantic history with the victim causes trouble and Rusty
is ultimately suspected of committing the murder. Rusty’s innocence is
undermined when he asks phone records to be kept out of the investigation, as
Rusty had called Polhemus frequently in the days leading up to the murder.
Rusty’s intent to cover up these phone records is suspicious, as it seems that
he has something to hide.
Rusty’s
innocence is once again undermined when prosecutor Tommy Molto (Joe Grifasi) confronts
Rusty and accuses him of committing the murder. Rather than remaining calm and
attempting to prove his innocence, Rusty storms out of the office. At this
moment, Rusty’s colleague, Raymond Horgan (Brian Dennehy), even begins to
question Rusty’s innocence. It would have been in Rusty’s best interest to have
kept his composure instead of angrily leaving in a fit of rage. Although being
accused of murder is a lot to take in, Rusty, who is familiar with the justice
system, should know that he is now in a vulnerable position and should be
cautious with how he presents himself to others.
Again,
Rusty’s innocence is questioned when his friend, Dan Lipranzer (John Spencer),
keeps a cup of Rusty’s so that it can be tested for fingerprints. Rusty’s
colleagues and close friends begin question his innocence, which leaves the
audience to believe that Rusty may have actually committed the murder. It is
clear that Dan’s only intention by taking the cup was to affirm his belief that
Rusty is in fact guilty of the murder.
Character
proxemics is a very important aspect of Presumed
Innocent. All of those who are initially close with Rusty begin to distance
themselves from him when evidence starts to suggest that Rusty is responsible
for Polhemus’ murder. In the scene where Rusty is brought into Horgan’s office,
his colleagues, as well as prosecutor Molto, keep a social and almost public
distance from Rusty, which signifies that Rusty is on his own.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteZoe Hall
ReplyDeleteI like how you brought up the component of Rusty's colleagues and close 'friends' being the major indicators of Rusty's guilt. They continually undermine Rusty's innocence by (as you mentioned) either trying to protect him by covering up or stealing evidence, or by attempting to distance themselves from what they perceive to be a bad investment.
Something I didn't see in the other blogs that you incorporated was your analysis of Rusty's behavior after he is first publicly accused. I think it is definitely an apt determination that he should have known better, as a prosecutor, to not react so vehemently to accusations, particularly when he is certain of his own innocence. This outburst of rage definitely encourages the audience to further question Rusty's role in Carolyn's murder.
I do think though that you could have been a little bit more detailed in your mise-en-scene analysis of his accusation. I can't remember exactly but I think that the lighting was also a key component in the audience and the character's understanding of Rusty's guilt.